Flawed Behavioral Psychology & Social Engineering
In the context of political science and behavioral conditioning theory, “social engineering” can be said to be the attempt of a government to shape the behavior of any target social group (men, boys, divorced fathers, smokers, etc.) with a Skinnerian conditioning system of rewards (positive reinforcement) and punishments (negative reinforcement) in the context of a rule-governed society. The problem with operant conditioning schemes is that they tend to ignore the internal thoughts and motivations of those individuals whose behavior the government is trying to control. Our current gynocentric government seems to believe that mere governance (courts, police, prisons, tax incentives, etc.) or rule-governed behavior within the framework of hundreds of thousands of anti-male and/or oppressive written laws combined with an overemphasis on the rewarding of desired external behaviors of targeted groups is enough to achieve the current gynocentric agenda that is motivated by misandry. This overemphasis on rewarding gynocentrically desired external behaviors ignores the internal realm of human conscious thought based on one’s belief system. The mere existence of the men’s rights movement and the thousands of blogs/websites in the manosphere has proven that their social engineering approach is wrong.
The Problem With Skinner Boxes
The gynocentric ruling elites in Western gynocracies seemed to have forgotten the flaws of Skinnerian Behavioral Psychology and like trapped rats they can’t think outside of the box – their Skinner box of course. Yes, you can force a rat to press a lever to get something to eat by shaping its behavior with a system of rewards and punishments (positive and negative reinforcement) when he is trapped in a Skinner box or rat torture chamber, but as soon as he gets back to his normal environment, it will be evident that the rat’s basic nature hasn’t been changed by the Skinner box. A rat is a rat. A rat is not a Skinner box animal and will never have a Skinner box nature. The basic nature of a rat existed before the invention of the anti-rat Skinner box, and the Skinner box system of rewards and punishments won’t ever change the basic nature of any rat. I guarantee you that as soon as the Skinner box escapee (the rat) figures out that he is no longer in the Skinner box (which is probably controlled by a feminist rat-hater Behavioral Psychologist), the rat in his normal environment, if you will pardon my English, ain’t gonna look for no damned, stupid Skinner box lever to push when it gets hungry! The rat only pushes the idiotic Skinner box lever when it is forced to do so to eat in the Skinner box.
Adaptive Behavior – The rat in the Skinner box presses the lever because it is able to adapt to new situations by utilizing a process called “learning” which tells the rat what it needs to do to survive in any situation that presents a system of rewards and punishments like the Skinner box or rat torture chamber. All animals and human beings have the ability to "learn" what they need to know to survive, so Skinnerian Behaviorial Psychology and the Skinnner box have accomplished the fact of only reminding us of what we have always been able to see in every day life – people adapt to life by "learning" what to do in new situations. In other words, if you suddenly find yourself living in China, you adapt by leaning some Chinese language vocabulary and if you need money, you might work as an English teacher, but your basic idea of your own identity wouldn’t change. What makes you "learn" how to adapt to each new situation comes from your own inner motivation to survive and enjoy life. No Behavioral Psychologist could ever know and understand everything that you would consider to be a reward. The main point to remember here is that the very fact of being able to adapt to any new system of rewards and punishments doesn’t change the basic nature of any human being or animal. A man is a man, a woman is a woman. A man is not a woman, a woman is not a man no matter how much dogmatic feminist proganda we are forced to listen to. Skinner boxes were invented to aid in the study of learning processes, not to learn how to change basic human nature or to develop a governmental system of rewards and punishments that ignore the innate nature of mankind.
Conscious Human Thought Eventually Wins Over Any System of Rewards and Punishments
Human beings exhibit adaptive behavior under a large number of systems of rewards and punishments such as when they live under a Communist/socialist government or under a modern-day anti-male Western gynocracy. In a Communist State, loyalty to the government is rewarded (positive reinforcement) while capitalism, loyalty to one’s religion or loyalty to a family identity is punished (negative reinforcement). An example of this is the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) under Stalin where religion and family loyalty were systematically attacked by the Communist regime. The shattering of the traditional family structure in the old Soviet Union is well known with its state nurseries (called day care centers for children in the USA), feminism, the facilitation of divorce (called no-fault divorce today), the ideology of free love, and the legalization of birth control and abortion, but the Communist attack on religion might not be so well remembered. With respect to religion, according to hollowverse.com,
“Stalin had a complex relationship with religion. He officially adopted the Russian Communist Party’s stance on religion, claiming atheism and continuing the tradition of teaching atheism in schools and propagating the idea that religion was only damaging to a perfect communist society. Stalin even took it further than his predecessor, Lenin, and initiated a nationwide campaign to destroy churches and religious property and even persecute and kill church officials. It is said that under Stalin, the Russian Orthodox Church went from 50,000 to 500 open and operating churches.”
And don’t forget the fact that aethists like Stalin have been the biggest mass murderers in history (a very powerful negative reinforcement is seeing someone being murdered because they didn’t obey communist dogma, the rat only gets an electric shock from the electric grid in the Skinner box as a negative reinforcement)- again from hollowverse.com:
“Stalin’s view that Russia could be forcibly brought into the industrial age–and with a Communist ideology–justified his horrific crimes against humanity. Estimates of how many Russians Stalin killed in the process range from 3 million to 60 million. Many were simply shot where they stood, many tortured to death, and many sent to forced labor camps where they died of malnutrition, abuse, or exposure. Stalin once said: One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic.”
A large image included here to get the idea across that Stalin was a REAL person
and psychopaths like Joseph Stalin can gain governmental power at any point in time
What’s the point?
Today’s Anti-Male Social Engineering Will Fail
Today’s gynocentric social engineering push seems to include a system of rewards and punishments that go against basic human nature and attacks the same things the old Stalinst regime’s communist social engineering structure attacked – religion, the traditional family and capitalism. Government policies and Hollywood media attack religion, masculinity, and traditional values on a daily basis. The idea of a family consisting of a father, mother, and children is explicitly and implicitly demonized while single mothers are worshipped. Female reproductive rights are championed while male reproductive rights are ignored. Government interference in small business is destroying thousands of independent small businesses owned by men every year at the same time that crony capitalism lines the pockets of corrupt government politicians and large corporations with billions of dollars. The entire IRS tax code is a series of rewards and punishments for certain behaviors. Government family courts regularly break up and colonize families, but ultimately the gynocentric social engineers will fail because men are already figuring their way out of the man-hater societal Skinner box.
Mankind’s eternal need for freedom is currently expressed in efforts for financial freedom, political freedom, and freedom of thought. Digital currencies such as Bitcoin and Litecoin and offshore asset protection strategies are real world examples that men exist who seek financial freedom. The existence of active men’s rights organizations, and the World Passport point to the current push by men for political freedom. Lastly, the existence of groups such as MGTOW.com and websites such as MaskedWriter.com and Gynocentrism.com illustrate that men desire freedom of thought to get out from under the oppressive anti-male social norms and thinking of gynocentrism.
Z Masked Writer